hyperion imaging systems 141 Search Results


98
Gatan Inc electron energy loss 141 spectroscopy eels
Electron Energy Loss 141 Spectroscopy Eels, supplied by Gatan Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/GIF+Continuum+and+Continuum+S/10__1021_slash_acscatal__8b00141-53-1-16
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
electron energy loss 141 spectroscopy eels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
fluidigm hyperion imaging systems 141
Hyperion Imaging Systems 141, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/Hyperion+Imaging+Mass+Cytometry+System/ppr0777010-70-15-14
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hyperion imaging systems 141 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Bio-Rad 141 imagelab software
141 Imagelab Software, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/Image+Lab+Software/pm26169672-54-18-21
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
141 imagelab software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Rockland Immunochemicals armenian hamster igg dylight 800
Armenian Hamster Igg Dylight 800, supplied by Rockland Immunochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/GOLDEN+SYRIAN+%26+ARMENIAN+HAMSTER+IGG+(H%26/pmc08205437-153-14-19
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
armenian hamster igg dylight 800 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Novus Biologicals 141 rrid ab 10001588

141 Rrid Ab 10001588, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/SOAT1+Antibody/pmc09925056-37-8-6
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
141 rrid ab 10001588 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Miltenyi Biotec antibodies against cytokeratin
Figure 1. In-cassette staining method for CTC detection. (A) Schematic overview of the workflow. Abbreviations: mononuclear cells (MNC), copy-number alterations (CNA) (B) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood. The samples were processed with DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA buffer on the Parsortix. CKPos, DAPIPos and CD45Neg cells were manually counted as CTCs, and the recovery was calculated from the number of spiked cells vs. number of detected cells. Data is presented as mean ± sd. The comparison between the two groups was done using a Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.019) (C) Test of two different priming and separation buffers: DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA. The harvested cells were plated on microscopy slides and the total number of DAPIPos cells were automatically counted. The harvested cell fraction was calculated from the total number of cells (harvested fraction + cells left in the cassette). Data is presented as mean ± sd. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.017) (D) Spike in of 100 prostate cancer cells (PC3, LnCAP, DU145, C4-2) as described in B (E) Recovery of 10 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood (F) Stability of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL of healthy blood (CellRescue). The blood was processed after ~ 1 h, 24 h (p = 0.062) or 72 h (p = 0.024) and stained as described in B. The comparison between the three groups was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test (G) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into a K2EDTA blood tube and processed after 1 h. Data is presented as mean ± sd. (H) Staining of four prostate cancer cell lines (PC3, LNCaP, DU145 and C4-2) with DAPI and <t>anti-CK.</t> The cells were images by imaging flow cytometry (ImageStream).
Antibodies Against Cytokeratin, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/Cytokeratin+LMW+Antibody%2C+anti-human/pm39080445-70-27-32
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against cytokeratin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti mouse igg
Figure 1. In-cassette staining method for CTC detection. (A) Schematic overview of the workflow. Abbreviations: mononuclear cells (MNC), copy-number alterations (CNA) (B) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood. The samples were processed with DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA buffer on the Parsortix. CKPos, DAPIPos and CD45Neg cells were manually counted as CTCs, and the recovery was calculated from the number of spiked cells vs. number of detected cells. Data is presented as mean ± sd. The comparison between the two groups was done using a Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.019) (C) Test of two different priming and separation buffers: DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA. The harvested cells were plated on microscopy slides and the total number of DAPIPos cells were automatically counted. The harvested cell fraction was calculated from the total number of cells (harvested fraction + cells left in the cassette). Data is presented as mean ± sd. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.017) (D) Spike in of 100 prostate cancer cells (PC3, LnCAP, DU145, C4-2) as described in B (E) Recovery of 10 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood (F) Stability of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL of healthy blood (CellRescue). The blood was processed after ~ 1 h, 24 h (p = 0.062) or 72 h (p = 0.024) and stained as described in B. The comparison between the three groups was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test (G) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into a K2EDTA blood tube and processed after 1 h. Data is presented as mean ± sd. (H) Staining of four prostate cancer cell lines (PC3, LNCaP, DU145 and C4-2) with DAPI and <t>anti-CK.</t> The cells were images by imaging flow cytometry (ImageStream).
Anti Mouse Igg, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/Anti-mouse+IgG%2C+HRP-linked+Antibody/pm37071495-92-16-18
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse igg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Addgene inc s136a 104 141 harada
Figure 1. In-cassette staining method for CTC detection. (A) Schematic overview of the workflow. Abbreviations: mononuclear cells (MNC), copy-number alterations (CNA) (B) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood. The samples were processed with DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA buffer on the Parsortix. CKPos, DAPIPos and CD45Neg cells were manually counted as CTCs, and the recovery was calculated from the number of spiked cells vs. number of detected cells. Data is presented as mean ± sd. The comparison between the two groups was done using a Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.019) (C) Test of two different priming and separation buffers: DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA. The harvested cells were plated on microscopy slides and the total number of DAPIPos cells were automatically counted. The harvested cell fraction was calculated from the total number of cells (harvested fraction + cells left in the cassette). Data is presented as mean ± sd. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.017) (D) Spike in of 100 prostate cancer cells (PC3, LnCAP, DU145, C4-2) as described in B (E) Recovery of 10 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood (F) Stability of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL of healthy blood (CellRescue). The blood was processed after ~ 1 h, 24 h (p = 0.062) or 72 h (p = 0.024) and stained as described in B. The comparison between the three groups was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test (G) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into a K2EDTA blood tube and processed after 1 h. Data is presented as mean ± sd. (H) Staining of four prostate cancer cell lines (PC3, LNCaP, DU145 and C4-2) with DAPI and <t>anti-CK.</t> The cells were images by imaging flow cytometry (ImageStream).
S136a 104 141 Harada, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/3604+pGEX4T-1+Bad+S136A+(104-141)+(Plasmid+%238801)/pm37776520-202-116-121
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
s136a 104 141 harada - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Nikon nis 141 elements software
Figure 1. In-cassette staining method for CTC detection. (A) Schematic overview of the workflow. Abbreviations: mononuclear cells (MNC), copy-number alterations (CNA) (B) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood. The samples were processed with DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA buffer on the Parsortix. CKPos, DAPIPos and CD45Neg cells were manually counted as CTCs, and the recovery was calculated from the number of spiked cells vs. number of detected cells. Data is presented as mean ± sd. The comparison between the two groups was done using a Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.019) (C) Test of two different priming and separation buffers: DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA. The harvested cells were plated on microscopy slides and the total number of DAPIPos cells were automatically counted. The harvested cell fraction was calculated from the total number of cells (harvested fraction + cells left in the cassette). Data is presented as mean ± sd. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.017) (D) Spike in of 100 prostate cancer cells (PC3, LnCAP, DU145, C4-2) as described in B (E) Recovery of 10 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood (F) Stability of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL of healthy blood (CellRescue). The blood was processed after ~ 1 h, 24 h (p = 0.062) or 72 h (p = 0.024) and stained as described in B. The comparison between the three groups was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test (G) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into a K2EDTA blood tube and processed after 1 h. Data is presented as mean ± sd. (H) Staining of four prostate cancer cell lines (PC3, LNCaP, DU145 and C4-2) with DAPI and <t>anti-CK.</t> The cells were images by imaging flow cytometry (ImageStream).
Nis 141 Elements Software, supplied by Nikon, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/NIS-Elements/pm30785343-66-4-7
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nis 141 elements software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Nidek CO sd-oct scans rs-3000 advance 2 spectral domain oct
Figure 1. In-cassette staining method for CTC detection. (A) Schematic overview of the workflow. Abbreviations: mononuclear cells (MNC), copy-number alterations (CNA) (B) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood. The samples were processed with DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA buffer on the Parsortix. CKPos, DAPIPos and CD45Neg cells were manually counted as CTCs, and the recovery was calculated from the number of spiked cells vs. number of detected cells. Data is presented as mean ± sd. The comparison between the two groups was done using a Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.019) (C) Test of two different priming and separation buffers: DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA. The harvested cells were plated on microscopy slides and the total number of DAPIPos cells were automatically counted. The harvested cell fraction was calculated from the total number of cells (harvested fraction + cells left in the cassette). Data is presented as mean ± sd. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.017) (D) Spike in of 100 prostate cancer cells (PC3, LnCAP, DU145, C4-2) as described in B (E) Recovery of 10 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood (F) Stability of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL of healthy blood (CellRescue). The blood was processed after ~ 1 h, 24 h (p = 0.062) or 72 h (p = 0.024) and stained as described in B. The comparison between the three groups was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test (G) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into a K2EDTA blood tube and processed after 1 h. Data is presented as mean ± sd. (H) Staining of four prostate cancer cell lines (PC3, LNCaP, DU145 and C4-2) with DAPI and <t>anti-CK.</t> The cells were images by imaging flow cytometry (ImageStream).
Sd Oct Scans Rs 3000 Advance 2 Spectral Domain Oct, supplied by Nidek CO, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/rs+3000/pm40010495-31-15-23
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sd-oct scans rs-3000 advance 2 spectral domain oct - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Proteintech hrp conjugated goat anti rabbit second antibody 142
Figure 1. In-cassette staining method for CTC detection. (A) Schematic overview of the workflow. Abbreviations: mononuclear cells (MNC), copy-number alterations (CNA) (B) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood. The samples were processed with DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA buffer on the Parsortix. CKPos, DAPIPos and CD45Neg cells were manually counted as CTCs, and the recovery was calculated from the number of spiked cells vs. number of detected cells. Data is presented as mean ± sd. The comparison between the two groups was done using a Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.019) (C) Test of two different priming and separation buffers: DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA. The harvested cells were plated on microscopy slides and the total number of DAPIPos cells were automatically counted. The harvested cell fraction was calculated from the total number of cells (harvested fraction + cells left in the cassette). Data is presented as mean ± sd. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.017) (D) Spike in of 100 prostate cancer cells (PC3, LnCAP, DU145, C4-2) as described in B (E) Recovery of 10 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood (F) Stability of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL of healthy blood (CellRescue). The blood was processed after ~ 1 h, 24 h (p = 0.062) or 72 h (p = 0.024) and stained as described in B. The comparison between the three groups was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test (G) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into a K2EDTA blood tube and processed after 1 h. Data is presented as mean ± sd. (H) Staining of four prostate cancer cell lines (PC3, LNCaP, DU145 and C4-2) with DAPI and <t>anti-CK.</t> The cells were images by imaging flow cytometry (ImageStream).
Hrp Conjugated Goat Anti Rabbit Second Antibody 142, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/Goat+anti-rabbit+IgG+(H%2BL)%2C+HRP+conjugate/pm32618512-71-7-14
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hrp conjugated goat anti rabbit second antibody 142 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal anti mcm7

Mouse Monoclonal Anti Mcm7, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hyperion+imaging+systems+141/MCM7+Antibody/pmc11269944-3-0-6
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal anti mcm7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Journal: eLife

Article Title: A concerted mechanism involving ACAT and SREBPs by which oxysterols deplete accessible cholesterol to restrict microbial infection

doi: 10.7554/eLife.83534

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Antibody , anti-ACAT1 (Rabbit Polyclonal) , Novus , CatNB400-141; RRID: AB_10001588 , WB (1:1,000).

Techniques: Transfection, Construct, Flow Cytometry, Recombinant, Sequencing, Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay, Microscopy, Protease Inhibitor, Modification, Saline, Methylation, Software, CRISPR, Imaging

Figure 1. In-cassette staining method for CTC detection. (A) Schematic overview of the workflow. Abbreviations: mononuclear cells (MNC), copy-number alterations (CNA) (B) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood. The samples were processed with DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA buffer on the Parsortix. CKPos, DAPIPos and CD45Neg cells were manually counted as CTCs, and the recovery was calculated from the number of spiked cells vs. number of detected cells. Data is presented as mean ± sd. The comparison between the two groups was done using a Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.019) (C) Test of two different priming and separation buffers: DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA. The harvested cells were plated on microscopy slides and the total number of DAPIPos cells were automatically counted. The harvested cell fraction was calculated from the total number of cells (harvested fraction + cells left in the cassette). Data is presented as mean ± sd. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.017) (D) Spike in of 100 prostate cancer cells (PC3, LnCAP, DU145, C4-2) as described in B (E) Recovery of 10 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood (F) Stability of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL of healthy blood (CellRescue). The blood was processed after ~ 1 h, 24 h (p = 0.062) or 72 h (p = 0.024) and stained as described in B. The comparison between the three groups was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test (G) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into a K2EDTA blood tube and processed after 1 h. Data is presented as mean ± sd. (H) Staining of four prostate cancer cell lines (PC3, LNCaP, DU145 and C4-2) with DAPI and anti-CK. The cells were images by imaging flow cytometry (ImageStream).

Journal: Scientific reports

Article Title: Combined microfluidic enrichment and staining workflow for single-cell analysis of circulating tumor cells in metastatic prostate cancer patients.

doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68336-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. In-cassette staining method for CTC detection. (A) Schematic overview of the workflow. Abbreviations: mononuclear cells (MNC), copy-number alterations (CNA) (B) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood. The samples were processed with DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA buffer on the Parsortix. CKPos, DAPIPos and CD45Neg cells were manually counted as CTCs, and the recovery was calculated from the number of spiked cells vs. number of detected cells. Data is presented as mean ± sd. The comparison between the two groups was done using a Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.019) (C) Test of two different priming and separation buffers: DPBS or DPBS + 1% BSA + 1 mM EDTA. The harvested cells were plated on microscopy slides and the total number of DAPIPos cells were automatically counted. The harvested cell fraction was calculated from the total number of cells (harvested fraction + cells left in the cassette). Data is presented as mean ± sd. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U test (p = 0.017) (D) Spike in of 100 prostate cancer cells (PC3, LnCAP, DU145, C4-2) as described in B (E) Recovery of 10 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL healthy donor blood (F) Stability of 100 PC3 cells spiked into 10 mL of healthy blood (CellRescue). The blood was processed after ~ 1 h, 24 h (p = 0.062) or 72 h (p = 0.024) and stained as described in B. The comparison between the three groups was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test (G) Recovery of 100 PC3 cells spiked into a K2EDTA blood tube and processed after 1 h. Data is presented as mean ± sd. (H) Staining of four prostate cancer cell lines (PC3, LNCaP, DU145 and C4-2) with DAPI and anti-CK. The cells were images by imaging flow cytometry (ImageStream).

Article Snippet: The captured cells in the cassette were incubated with permeabilization buffer (20 min) containing separation buffer + 0.15% saponin (Sigma-Aldrich, 47036) followed by immunostaining (90 min) with antibodies against cytokeratin (FITC-conjugated, Macs Miltenyi biotech, 130-118-964, clone CK36H5, 1:100), CD45 (Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated, eBioscience, 51-0459-42, clone HI30, 1:100) and DAPI (Fischer Scientific, D1304, 1:10.000) diluted in separation buffer containing 0.05% saponin.

Techniques: Staining, Comparison, MANN-WHITNEY, Microscopy, Imaging, Flow Cytometry

Journal: iScience

Article Title: Characterizing replisome disassembly in human cells

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110260

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Mouse monoclonal anti-MCM7 (clone 141.2) , Santa Cruz , Cat#Sc-9966; RRID: AB_627235.

Techniques: Recombinant, Transfection, Imaging, Isolation, Immunoprecipitation, Sequencing, shRNA, Plasmid Preparation, CRISPR, Marker, Software, Cell Analysis